The very concept of plagiarism is directly related to copyright and is reflected in the use, assignment, and publication of intellectual property without the consent and reference to the source.
Of particular importance in the student learning environment, the problem of plagiarism in educational work that appeared with the availability of information and the development of Internet technology in the late nineties, then the most intelligent students managed to download downloaded from the Internet coursework, diplomas, and essays. evaluation. Because computer literacy did not come to the teaching staff immediately and the technology of that time did not allow to track clones, of course, abstracts and even diploma, and only when the teacher found identical works or works are vaulted of the few, the secret became clear. When the problem of plagiarism and compilation in the student environment reached its peak, some higher education institutions tried to raise the requirements for the uniqueness of student work, as technically this can be tracked with the antiplagiarism program, even before identifying it in a specific percentage, although it can be noted that uniqueness work and the presence of plagiarism in it is not quite the same. For example, rewriting or paraphrasing a text easily removes the question of uniqueness but does not rule out plagiarism, and conversely the presence in the text of a large number of citations and references necessary for the integrity of the work does not make plagiarism work, although uniqueness can be very low, but at the same time the nature and amount of use of citations even with references in some cases may call into question the authorship and may be recognized as plagiarism, for example the section consists of a whole piece of book, or conclusions from another work, used data from another study that reduces the practical significance of the work…
It can also be noted that the idea is also not plagiarism, unless of course it is to use ready-made technical solutions, and again it all depends on the content and purpose of educational or scientific work. If the goal is to develop a specific methodology and it already exists, it will be plagiarism, and if we use a well-known technique for research, it will not be a violation of copyright and skillful use of methodology in the work.
Given that the issue of plagiarism is quite ambiguous, its presence can be determined using not only technical means of tracking uniqueness but also direct analysis of all work and its parts through proofreading, analysis of citations and results of the anti-plagiarism program.
In view of the above, we can safely object to the new introduction of some higher education institutions to allow work on the preliminary results of the anti-plagiarism program, which essentially determines the uniqueness of the work, which is not an indicator of plagiarism!
Strict teachers can be reminded that the course work is an analysis of someone else’s material and their own conclusions. A diploma is a new vision of old material. There is no originality in this.
In the carefree struggle for student rights should also not forget about the meaning of writing student works which is the development of the author’s beginnings in the works, so the more in your research papers will be your thoughts, conclusions, ideas, research, the higher the scientific value of your future intellectual creation. We wish you success in your scientific and educational activities.
Plagiarism in legal works or how to rewrite the Constitution in your own words
Plagiarism in a graduation thesis is a fairly common situation. Writing 100% unique legal work is not an easy task. You can’t say “the order of the cabinet minister” or “a bad man hid taxes”. But you can order term paper online and get rid of problems. But how else can you make dry text unique? We will understand the details.
Remember the lectures at school? Only now you need to retell in your own words, for example, the Constitution. Links, terms, article numbers complicate rewriting. But if our legislators manage to write some laws (although they are doing it as if “by the way”), we, young people, will certainly be able to do a thesis.
Tricks with Regulatory Sources: Bypassing Plagiarism in the Thesis by Law
The names of laws, orders, regulations cannot be transformed. However, within the framework of one chapter or section of the thesis, it is enough to indicate the entire normative act once and further in the text be limited only by the number.
First, the number of non-unique fragments is significantly reduced. Secondly, the volume of useful dough increases. In exceptional cases, it is permissible to shorten the date, limited to the year of adoption. The format is often used as number and year after fraction. For example, No. 2/2010 or ZU No. 12 of 2011.
Links and citations
Master’s and thesis work on legal topics is necessarily based on norms and legal regulations. Moreover, if you include direct quotes and excerpts from instructions, laws, orders – when checking for plagiarism, whole colored paragraphs are immediately highlighted.
It is enough to refer to the article number and reformulate the content without losing meaning. Again, we recall the school presentation. Well, or a toast for your birthday – from year to year you wish the same thing, but in different words.
If you cannot do without a quote or an excerpt, it is recommended to place only key information in quotes and skip individual phrases by specifying ellipses.
The Antiplagiat system does not check correctly formed links and footnotes in a special format, as well as hyperlinks! This part seems to become invisible, but it is also not taken into account in the total number of characters and the volume.
In this way, you can refer to international acts, conventions and other sources. The text contains a laconic title (Convention, Covenant of Rights), and the exact wording is made in the link.
Correctly decorated wine in a special format, as well as a hyper-compliant Antiplagіat system does not change!
Replacement of terms
The Constitution and the entire legislative framework are replete with definitions (what is not an abstruse word for a diploma?). Naturally, any coursework in law or other work in jurisprudence must include precise wording. But the uniqueness is influenced by the frequency of terms in the text.
Do not oversaturate the material with complex, highly specialized terms. For example, in a work devoted to bankruptcy issues, such a stable phrase as “bankruptcy” can be alternated with alternative, legally verified phrases: “insolvency establishment”, “financial insolvency confirmation”.
Here are some examples of equivalent substitutions:
- deviant – illegal;
- regulating – setting;
- lobbying – promotion;
- nihilism is ignorance.
Special dictionaries are used to find literate and appropriate synonyms. Google to help, so to speak. At the same time, the phrase should not be taken out of context and distort the essence of the thesis. Avoid colloquial language, tautology. If the rewrite check shows an insufficient level of uniqueness, check the material for spamming and shorten frequently repeated terms.
And remember, there is always a safety option – to turn to professionals.